SPOLIATIONS ARMA SUPERSUS
Click on the clock:
The Echo of the Mountains you request insistently click the link below to read intelligently the following and not piss off by jérusalistes:
FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION, FREEDOM ...
My friends, my friends, is serious: FRANCE and Europe are a dictatorship with a tyrant called USRAËL, evidence is:
The European Union formally authorizes the transfer of our personal data to Israel!
Writes the site 'EQUALITY and Reconciliation:
Personal data means your accounts bank, your phone, email, health, family, traveling ... All the data the government and the States shall collect from you. All of this is transferred to Israel on the condition that the Zionist parasite careful that for him. * This decision
recall that this is done despite the sionistan has no written constitution (paragraph 5), but just a supreme court (of course: very stable as legislative system).
* Control of the Data Protection (section 10 and section 1.2) is made by an independent authority: Authority Israeli law responsible, information and technology, the "ILIT" (that is very independent, actually).
* Point 12 suggests very clearly that it applies only to automatic processing (do not they all are?), So that the beneficiary can hide behind that.
* And this is not the worst, I'll let you take your 5 minutes to read the paper, there are 7 items, it's fast, clear and effective.
Coming targeted assassinations on our soil (well, the soil of the European Commission), for the security of Israel ? Pass it on ... Seriously. Let everyone know how slowly it goes. Release on that.
The Echo of the Mountains ask all MEPs to resign, as sovereign peoples and free does not give them a mandate to deliver our personal data to Israel.
If they do not, do not vote more for them because they have betrayed you !!!!!!
of January 31, 2011
finding, pursuant to Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and Council the adequate protection of personal data provided by the State of Israel regarding the automated processing of personal data
[notified under document number C (2011) 332]
(Text of the EEA relevance)
(2011/61/UE)
THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION
regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
seen Directive 95/46 / EC of the European Parliament and Council of 24 October 1995 on the protection of individuals the processing of personal data and the free movement of such data (1), and in particular Article 25, paragraph 6,
After consulting the European Data Protection
recital following:
(1) Under Directive 95/46/EC, Member States shall provide that the transfer of personal data to third countries can be made only if the third country in question ensures an adequate level of protection and if the national laws implementing other provisions of the Directive are complied before the transfer.
(2) The Commission may find a third country ensures an adequate level of protection. In this case, personal data may be transferred from Member States without additional guarantees being necessary.
(3) Pursuant to Directive 95/46/EC the level of data protection should be considered in the light of all circumstances surrounding a transfer or a category of data transfers and given certain conditions as listed in Article 25.
(4) Given the different approaches taken by third countries in terms of data protection, it should ensure that the assessment of the adequacy of the protection and enforcement of any decision based on Article 25, paragraph 6 of Directive 95/46/EC does not create arbitrary or unjustifiable discrimination against countries where similar conditions exist or between third countries and does not constitute a disguised barrier to trade taking regard to existing international commitments of the European Union.
(5) The legal system State of Israel does not have a written constitution, but the Israeli Supreme Court gave constitutional status to certain "fundamental laws". These "fundamental laws" are complemented by a large body of case law, the legal system of the State of Israel according to a large extent the principles of customary law. The right to respect for private life enshrined in Article 7 of the Basic Law on Human Dignity and Freedom.
(6) The legal standards for the protection of personal data in the State of Israel are based largely on the standards set out in Directive 95/46/EC and are included in the 5741-1981 Law on the Protection of Privacy Act, last amended in 2007 to introduce new requirements Treatment of personal data and clarify the organization of the supervisory authority.
(7) The legislation on data protection is further supplemented by government decisions concerning the implementation of the 5741-1981 Law on the Protection of Privacy and the organization and operating authority control, largely based on recommendations in the report submitted to the Department of Justice by the committee to review legislation on databases (the "Report Schoffman).
(8) Provisions on data protection are also included in several legal instruments regulating different sectors, such as legislation on the financial sector, regulations on health and public records.
(9) The legal standards for data protection in the State of Israel repeat all the basic principles necessary for adequate protection for individuals regarding the processing of personal data in automated databases. Chapter 2 of the 5741-1981 Law on the Protection of Privacy Act, which sets out principles for the processing of personal data, do not apply to processing of personal data in non-automated basis ( database manually).
(10) The application of legal standards of data protection is guaranteed by the Administrative Appeals and judicial and independent control exercised by the supervisory authority, the authority responsible for the Israeli right, Information and Technology (the "ILIT"), with powers of investigation and intervention and acting in total indépendance.FR 02.01.2011 Official Journal of the European Union L 27/39
(1) OJ L 281, 23.11.1995, p. 31.
(11) The Israeli authorities on data protection provided explanations and assurances about how Israeli law must be interpreted and confirmed that Israeli law on data protection was applied on that interpretation. This decision takes into account these explanations, and these assurances, and therefore dependent.
(12) should therefore consider that the State of Israel ensures an adequate level of protection of personal data, as mentioned in Directive 95/46/EC as regards transfers international automated personal data from the European Union to the State of Israel or, if not automated transfers subject to additional automated processing in the territory of the State of Israel. However, international transfers of personal data from the European Union to the State of Israel for which the actual transfer and the subsequent processing of data is performed entirely in a non-automated should not be covered by this decision.
(13) To ensure transparency and to enable the competent authorities of Member States to protect individuals with regard to processing of personal data, it should specify under what circumstances the suspension of specific data flows may be justified, notwithstanding the finding of an adequate level of protection.
(14) The findings on the level of protection contained in this decision concerning the state of Israel, as defined under international law. Subsequent transfers to a recipient outside the territory of the State of Israel, as defined under international law, should be considered transfers of personal data to third countries.
(15) The protection group of individuals with regard to processing of personal data established under Article 29 of Directive 95/46/EC has issued a positive opinion on the adequacy of level of protection of personal data regarding international transfers of automated personal data from the European Union or, if they are not automated, transfers treated Additional automated the territory of the State of Israel. In its recommendation, the Working Group urged the Israeli authorities to adopt additional measures to extend the application of Israeli law to the databases manually, explicitly recognize the principle of proportionality in the treatment of personal data in the private sector and interpret the exemptions relating to international transfers of data according to criteria in its "Discussion Paper on a common interpretation provisions of Article 26, paragraph 1 of Directive 95/46/EC of 24 October 1995 (1). It was considered that opinion in the preparation of this decision (2).
(16) The Committee established under Article 31, paragraph 1 of Directive 95/46/EC has rendered its opinion within the time limit set by its chairman,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article I
1. For the purposes of Article 25, paragraph 2 of Directive 95/46/EC, the State of Israel is deemed to ensure a level of protection adequacy of personal data transferred from the European Union regarding the international transfer of automated personal data from the European Union or, if they are not automated, transfers treated Additional automated the territory of the State of Israel.
2. The supervisory authority of the State of Israel for the application of legal rules on data protection in the State of Israel is the Authority Israeli law responsible, Information and Technology (the "ILIT"), mentioned in the Annex to this Decision.
Article 2
1. This decision relates only to the level of protection ensured in the State of Israel, as defined under international law to meet the requirements of Article 25, paragraph 1 of Directive 95/46/EC and does not affect other conditions or restrictions implementing other provisions of the Directive which apply to data processing personal in the Member States.
2. This decision is implemented in accordance with international law. It is without prejudice to the status of the Golan Heights, the Gaza Strip and West Bank, including East Jerusalem, under international law.
Article 3
1. Without prejudice to their powers to take measures to ensure compliance with national provisions adopted pursuant to provisions other than Article 25 of Directive 95/46/EC, the competent authorities of Member States may exercise the powers currently available to them to suspend the transfer of data to a recipient in the State of Israel to protect individuals with regard to the processing of personal data concerning them in the following cases:
a) a competent authority Israel has determined that the recipient does not meet applicable standards of protection; ouFR L 27/40 Official Journal of the European Union 01.02.2011
(1) Paper WP114, 25 November 2005. To see the site (http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/privacy/docs/wpdocs/2005/ wp114_fr.pdf).
(2) Opinion 6 / 2009 on the level of protection of personal data provided in Israel. To see the site (http://ec.europa.eu/ justice_home/fsj/privacy/docs/wpdocs/2009/wp165_fr.pdf).
b) it is likely that the protection standards are not met, there is every reason to believe that the Israeli authority does not or will not take timely, appropriate action to resolve the problem, the continuing transfer would create an imminent risk of grave harm to the persons concerned and the competent authorities of the Member State have made reasonable efforts in these circumstances to notify the controller in the State of Israel and give him the opportunity to respond.
2. The suspension shall cease as soon as the standards of protection are assured and the competent authority in the Member States concerned is notified.
Article 4
1. Member States shall immediately inform the Commission of measures adopted on the basis of Article 3.
2. Member States and the Commission shall inform each other of cases where the measures taken by the authorities of the State of Israel responsible for ensuring standards of protection are not sufficient to ensure such compliance.
3. If the information collected under Article 3 and Paragraphs 1 and 2 of this article show that any body charged with enforcing the standards of protection in the State of Israel does not fulfill its mission effectively, the Commission inform the competent Israeli authority and, if necessary, present draft measures in accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 31, paragraph 2 of Directive 95/46/EC to cancel or suspend the This decision or limiting its scope.
Article 5
The Commission evaluates the implementation of this decision and share any pertinent findings to the Committee established by Article 31 of Directive 95/46/EC, including any element may affect the assessment made in section 1 of this Decision adequate level of protection ensured in the State of Israel within the meaning of Article 25 of Directive 95/46/EC and any evidence that this decision is implemented in a discriminatory manner. In Specifically, it will monitor the processing of personal data in the databases manually.
Article 6
Member States shall take all measures necessary to comply with this decision within three months of its notification.
Article 7
Member States are recipients of this decision.
Done at Brussels, 31 January 2011.
the Commission
Viviane Reding
Vice présidenteFR 02.01.2011 Official Journal of the Union 27/41 The European
SCHEDULE
Competent control authority referred to in Article 1, paragraph 2, of this decision:
Authority responsible for the Israeli right, Information and Technology ("ILIT")
The Government Campus
9th floor
125 Begin Rd Tel Aviv
Israel
Mailing Address: PO Box
7360
Tel Aviv 61072
Tel. + 972-3-7634050
Fax + 972-2-6467064
Email: ILITA@justice.gov.il
Internet http://www.justice.gov.il/MOJEng/RashutTech/default.htmFR Journal L 27/42 Official EU 01/02/2011
The ECHO MOUNTAIN always told you that Israel is the 28th state of Europe.
Remember this, read the reactions on ER:
ahahah, great! Europe seems very confident with Israel concerning the management of personal data. Our leaders may have forgotten that Israel has usurped European identities to assassinate a member Hamas in a hotel in Dubai, not so long? Today, it would mean that each of us can contribute unwittingly to crap Mossad.
Hat Ladies and gentlemen of Europe.
So what we expect, to be chained for all brainwashed and do something? But there is no dream! This news alone would justify a rising tomorrow!
whole question is what Empire deems "objectionable" tomorrow ... and it is very difficult for anyone to predict a little bit informed.
Today he sets up his surveillance devices, ostensibly to fight against "terrorism" ... tomorrow it passes laws and you are the "terrorist" because you visit R & E once a day.
And with surveillance cameras at all street corners, tracing the meter almost go with the GPS chip in your cell phone, listened and read your communications, your data in the hands of the government and its services ( when these are not services aliens), it will be hard to escape them ...
is what David Icke calls the "totalitarian tiptoe" ... there comes to this totalitarian society, slowly but surely, little by little laws after laws, measure after measure, ...
